For the past week or so I’d been seeing the name bloggers eagerly anticipating the release of the 2015 name stats from the Social Security Administration — it’s only because of them that I knew it was going to happen today, because I’m the absolute worst at being in the know and at the right place at the right time and the first one with the breaking news and all — I was actually stressed out at the idea of having to blog about it quickly and though I’d wait until tomorrow to do it. I’m so. weird.
But I took a look at the list this morning, and had a couple things to say so I thought I *would* post about it today after all, as I should, being a name blogger and all, and I’d love to hear your thoughts too!
My first reaction was absolute shock that Harper is now in the top ten for girls. Wow! I had NO idea it was that popular!!
Noah and Emma retained their #1 spots, and I’m feeling surprised by that because the people I discuss names with (mostly all of you) tend to stay away from those names because of past popularity, so all I hear about them is that they’re generally not being used. But they’re great names and pretty “normal” (not like Abcde, for example), so I’m not disappointed that they’re the names on top.
I also took a quick look at the names that increased in popularity from 2014 — Alaia had the biggest increase for girls, jumping up 2012 spots from #2676 in 2014 to #664 in 2015! WOW!! Others that jumped up more than a thousand places are Meilani, Aitana, Aislinn, Taya, and Adeline (I love Aislinn and Adeline).
The boy name with the biggest increase is Riaan, up 1360 spots from #2286 in 2014 to #926 in 2015. No other boy names increased by a thousand or more — the next closest was Huxley, up 392 spots from 1354 to 962.
I didn’t scrutinize the list, but the other name that jumped out at me was Zaylee — #1304 to #990. I can’t imagine that’s influenced by our St. Zelie, since so many of us aren’t even sure how to say it, so I assume it’s a Baylee/Kaylee name … what a weird and interesting convergence of super Catholic and super trendy!
No shock at all was the fact that the girl name Isis took the biggest hit, decreasing 1065 spots from #705 to #1770. Maybe I’m surprised it didn’t fall farther?
That’s all I have to say for the moment, but be sure to check out those who have a better handle on it all than I do — some good analysis in these pieces, and more will be coming in the next few days I’m sure:
Appellation Mountain: Harper and Benjamin Enter the US Top Ten! (Abby had made some great predictions — including that both Harper and Benjamin would enter the top ten! Wow!)
Nameberry: Emma and Noah Top Baby Names List … Again
Baby Name Wizard: The Most Popular Baby Names in America for 2015
And we were just considering Noah…sigh…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahh! It’s a great name — it’s #1 for a reason!
LikeLike
It’s been in the #1 spot for a few years, but remember that we have a great deal more naming diversity now than we did even 30 years ago. So, there were 19,511 boys named Noah last year in the entire country. Compare that to 1980, when the #1 boys’ name, Michael, garnered nearly 70,000(!) uses. (By 1986, Michael was still the #1 boys’ name, with over 64,000 boys named that, and Christopher in the #2 spot had over 56,000. In fact, ALL of the names in the top 20 for boys in 1986 were used in excess of 21,000 times. That means the 20th most popular name in 1986 was used more times that year than the very most popular name, Noah, was in 2015.)
So basically, if you name your child Noah, he’s likely to meet other boys named that. He’s not very likely to sit in an entire classroom of other Noahs or be on a sports team filled with “Noah B.”, “Noah M.”, and “Noah S.”
LikeLiked by 4 people
Always a great point to remember! You explained it very well too.
LikeLiked by 3 people
My oldest son has a name that’s always been in the top ten (William), and we’ve yet to meet another William in his age group! (Interestingly, I have nephews named Ethan and Mason, also top ten names.) 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes! I was surprised to find William there, it feels old school to me (in a good way, I love it) — maybe because I know so many Wills and Liams and forget that they might very well be Williams!
LikeLiked by 1 person
To put this in context, there are 66,700 public elementary schools in the United States. That means that there’s only about a 1-in-3 chance of an elementary school having even a single Noah entering first grade 6 years from now.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love when I have stats explained to me this way. You’re a star! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
JoAnna, yes! I have a son with a top-10 name, too (James), and we also don’t know any other Jameses. I was surprised to learn it was a top-10 name, actually.
We do know one William, though! He’s 7. 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
grace—it’s so interesting when you put it that way! It makes it seem so much less popular 😀
Also, my sister is a first grade teacher and I don’t think she has ever had a repeat name in one of her classes. Maybe in the grade, but never in the class. Lots of similar names though, so that should be kept in mind. With Noah there aren’t many similar names. But a name like Ella (can’t come up with a boy name) has lots of similar names (Bella, Isabella, Stella ect) and is a nickname (Elizabeth, Eleanor) so Ella will seem super popular where as Charlotte might not seem as popular because there aren’t as many similar names.
PS. JoAnna-William is my favorite name ever 😀 😀 😀
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ooh Grace that’s a great example with Ella rhyming with so many other names, and being possibly used as a nickname for two other very popular names. Wow!
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is all making me think of the movie “Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation” (1962), where the dad (Jimmy Stewart) approaches a group of teenage boys at the local dance and says, “Hey, Jim!” One boy (played by Fabian of beachy dreamboat fame) turns around and says, “Yes, sir?” and the dad gives Jim $5!to dance with his daughter who’s feeling shy and unsociable. They end up falling for each other, of course. Later, the mom (Maureen O’Hara) asks how he knew the boy, and he said, “I just figured one of them had to be named Jim!”
James was the most popular name of the 1940’s and 50’s, with almost 800,000 babies named that in the 40’s alone! So different from today! I can’t imagine that father’s trick working today! How would he even know what name to guess?!
(Incidentally, other than this scene, the movie “Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation” is NOT very good.)
LikeLiked by 3 people
Haha! I love that! Yeah really: “How would he even know what name to guess” today?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Quote: He’s not very likely to sit in an entire classroom of other Noahs or be on a sports team filled with “Noah B.”, “Noah M.”, and “Noah S.”
My son’s baseball team (Catholic high school, both Varsity & JV included) has 5 Joseph’s – so they go by a variety of nicknames. And we all laugh about it in the stands. And in our Catholic homeschool circles Joseph is by far and away the most common name – we joke that you have to have a Joseph to be in our group. It definitely depends on your “peer” group – we are living in one that is definitely biases. In secular life he doesn’t often run into other Josephs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh that’s hilarious!! It definitely depends on your group!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
grace – regarding your James observation from the Jimmy Stewart movie – we can do that with “Joseph” at any homeschool function and get about half a dozen guys who would respond – LOL
LikeLiked by 2 people
HAhaha love it!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love that the SSA releases the data around Mother’s Day. I’ve been rapid fire entering all my favorites and my children’s names to see what’s trending. Thought people around here would be interested that Stella has risen from number 66 to 51.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will definitely remember from now on that the data is released around Mother’s Day — I can’t believe I didn’t realize that before!
Yes I did see that Stella is continuing its popularity arc — very good to know!
LikeLike
My sister just named her baby Stella a few months ago, and we know a couple other little Stellas, so this makes sense to me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s weird that Emma has cycled back into popularity so quickly. Wasn’t it hugely popular just 15 years ago or so? It was my favorite name as a teenager, lo, these many years ago, but I’d never use it now. Though it’s a traditional name, its in-and-out popularity over the last nearly two decades makes it seem too trendy and too omnipresent.
Nameberry predicted Charlotte’s rise ages ago when no one else saw it coming, so that feels gratifying to me since I favor Nameberry. 😉
I was amused to see my nephew’s name (Noah) in the top 10, along with my sister’s dog’s name (Mason)! They are a top-10 kind of family, I guess! Lol!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Emma has been rising since the 80s, and it cracked the top 100 in 1993 🙂 It’s been hanging out in and around the top 10 for about 15 years now. The interesting thing is, Emma is the name that dethroned Emily, then it immediately fell to number 2 then 3, then came back to number 1, which is a rather strange trajectory for a name!
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s true about Emily, I’d forgotten that!
LikeLike
I think Grace is referring to Emma, which has moved up and down within the top 5 and has previously been in the #1 spot. It does seem unusual for it to have gone up and down, and in and out of #1, which is what I was also referring to.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I had to look up Emma because I thought it had only been on an upward trajectory (not in-and-out) and it has been — since the late seventies/early eighties it’s only increased in popularity each year and has been in the top five every year since 2002! So yes, it was hugely popular 15 years ago, and has only gotten more so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not surprised you loved it as a teenager, you’ve inherited your parents’ ahead-of-the-curve naming
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually—sorry Emma fans!—hate it now. 😳
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahahaha!! I love it, and it’s one of my husband’s very favorites, he’s always liked it — Charlotte too — and I’m pretty sure both are because of Jane Austen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But it’s true about being ahead of the curve, at least if Fiona is any indication. It’s up almost 250 spots over the last 15 years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! And I totally think Emma could be one of your sisters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know about that, other than the “ahead of the curve” thing. I don’t think my parents have either read a Jane Austen book, ever. I think they would consider Emma to be both “too English” and “too cute” (based on my impression of their opinions of things). I know they liked Maria and Mia as possible girls’ names, and Anthony was supposed to be the next boy’s name if they’d had one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m just constantly amazed that they named you and your sibs the way they did — Emma seems to fit right in, but I’m looking at it with 2016 eyes so maybe it doesn’t fit back then as well as I would think …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I *think* the style they were going for was dark and exotic, maybe gothic? They love Russian and French literature. I think, today, that at least Emma and Grace “match”, but I just can’t see them ever using any name that they construed as either matronly or perky, and I think it’s possible Emma could have had either of those connotations before it became ubiquitous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“matronly or perky” 😂😂😂 That’s great!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, but note that Mia is a top-10 name today and that was the name my mom really wanted for another girl!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love looking at the new lists every year!! The statistics like grace cited earlier in response the Colleen are what makes it so fascinating to me!!
In terms of my feelings on the popularity of the names I love, I don’t really care. I actually kind of like my names being popular because it means I get to hear them more! And popular names (for the most part) are popular because they’re so great!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh! Also I learned in discussion with my local Catholic friends that they all prefer the pronunciation “Zellie” for Zelie, except me. I still don’t think it’s an intuitive pronunciation because the name has only one L. I strongly prefer the “Zaylee” pronunciation because it’s closer to the French and preserves the Azalea connection (Zélie was a nickname for Azélie). I also think it is slightly more intuitive given the spelling (though probably in a vacuum, English speakers would pronounce this word “zee-lee”, right?) But I’m apparently way in the minority!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love hearing about conversations like this! So interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I asked my mom how she’d pronounce it awhile ago and she said Zellie. I’ve never met anyone with the name but I think Americans would probably go with Zellie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s my guess as well, and I what I default to myself.
LikeLike
I am another “Zay-lee” (spelled Zelie) girl! Zellie rhymes with “belly” or “jelly” to me, and for some reason, “Ellie” doesn’t create that same issue for me haha. Just “Zellie”… and I too like the Azelie/Azalea connection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Grace, like Emma, is also showing amazing staying power. Though it never hit the top 10 it’s not been falling much either. I let it’s popularity scare me off in 2008 and man do I regret that! Though my little girl is a great Katharine!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Katharine and Grace are both great names!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes indeed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It did peak in popularity at #13 in 2004, with 12,528 girls given that name (it was also #13 in 2003, but with fewer uses). But again, see my comment above to Colleen. With 66,700 public elementary schools in the US, you can see that fewer than one school in five would even have a girl named Grace in a given grade.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do think we might have been in a Grace pocket as there were so many the age of my older kids (born 2002-2005). Now I hope maybe one of my boys will marry one.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Haha! Or maybe a grandbaby?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know too many Graces! I can think of one … and another Gracie who’s actually a Graciela.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually graduated with 5 other Graces weirdly!! There must have been a Grace-bomb in my town in 1995-1996!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow!
LikeLiked by 1 person
*Grace-boom
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know no other Graces in person over the age of about 15. There are 3 Graces on my son’s swim team, but that’s the first time I’ve ever seen any kind of “pocket” of Graces!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Grace – I had to laugh about your correction of Grace-bomb when you meant Grace-boom. I honestly really like the visual of a “Grace-bomb” both actually for the an explosion of Grace namings (like it fell and the debris settled into all the homes and hospitals where new babies were being born). LOL – Or a heavenly “Grace-bomb” where we are showered with heavenly graces. ; )
And grace – I love a “pocket of Graces” – sounds like a book title for daily reflections on the small blessings we receive from God.
Am totally smiling at these visuals now. Got to run.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I loved Grace-bomb too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, people named Grace ARE “the bomb”. 😂😂😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Grace is a family name on my Dh’s side… there are about 4 I believe women with the name — either first or middle, with the matriarch being Dh’s grandmother named Graciella (spelling? It’s Spanish). I knew one Grace in high school, and have maybe met one or two little ones?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am always so fascinated by these lists! So many of the names that are popular are names that I never encounter (on young kids). All of my three boys are between top 28-40 as are several other names we considered. That’s apparently our sweet spot! 😉 I’m surprised to see Sebastian so high and Lucy is not as high as I would have guessed.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love when parents have a “sweet spot” popularity-wise, and I find that it’s usually inadvertent. So cool!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This grouping of favorite names around a similar popularity number is fascinating. As you know, I’ve been torn between Peter and Henry for this baby lately. Peter is nearly identical in rank to Paul and Mark (though Paul and Mark have both slipped considerably since we used them) and Henry is hanging out in the same ballpark as Andrew and James (or at least where James was when we used it).
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oooh interesting! I like that! It could give you further ammunition for whichever name you like more! Clearly, both Peter and Henry fit with your kids!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just love both Peter and Henry! They’re both in my top 10 favorite names. My impression is that Henry is a slightly safer choice than Peter, a bit more ordinary, but so handsome. Peter is more bold, but fantastic!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A friend recently named her daughter Zaylee Louise, obviously after the Martins. She picked that spelling because it would be harder to mispronounce. I much prefer that pronunciation to Zellie, which may or may not be strange, since my own daughter is Ellie (formal name Elizabeth).
LikeLiked by 3 people
So interesting!
LikeLike
I agree about the pronunciation!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It took me a while to warm up to Zelie for our daughter (pronounced like Jelly with a Z), but with little French in us paired with a Hispanic complexion, it would have been weird to correct people for the “Zaylee” version… which in Texas, you can only imagine the latter pronunciation with a southern accent 🙂
I also tried to vie for “zel-LEE” with the emphasis at the end, but it also had the French pronunciation issue. Alas, my sister is having an Elizabeth 6 weeks after us and they’re going to call her Ellie so I hope these cousins are friends!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love hearing real-life experiences with the beautiful Zelie — thank you for sharing!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Since I’m a name nerd, I took a look at some of the names you’ve been recommending frequently.
Zelie and variants definitely increased in popularity, probably because the saint was canonized last year.
Zelie
2014: 25
2015: 50
Zellie
2014: 9
2015: 12
Zaylee
2014: 181
2015: 270
Azelia
2014: 24
2015: 25
Azelie
2014: 6
2015: 17
No significant impact on Louis
2014: 1,212
2015: 1,201
or on
Therese
2014: 71
2015: 63
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ahh! I just did a little post about this! I didn’t think to look up Azelia though, nice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose Azelia might overlap with Azalea/Azalia. Isn’t there a singer by that name? That might have influenced the popularity too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Iggy Azalea! So many things to consider, what a complicated multi-faceted name!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] of Zaylee appearing in the top 1000 in 2015 and the comments (here and here) on my post from this morning regarding Zelie/Zaylee I looked up Zaylee, Zelie, Zellie, […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
I seem to be a top 20 namer for all my sons…Over the past 28 years (when I started naming) all my boy names have been and continue to be in the top 20 (or just barely under) over that whole span of time. Two were named at their peak and have been dropping since, the other wasn’t yet in the top 20 when we named but jumped quickly and was number one for 14 years (any guesses on that one…LOL)
At the time of the first two, I really paid little attention to the baby name popularity and trends (pre-internet, don’t you know) so we didn’t know what we didn’t know about popular names except for the announcement of top 10 every year in the newspaper.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“But a name like Ella (can’t come up with a boy name) has lots of similar names (Bella, Isabella, Stella ect) and is a nickname (Elizabeth, Eleanor) so Ella will seem super popular…”
Maybe a boy example is Jack (Jackson, Jaxson, Jaxon, Jax) which has a similar sound to Jake and is a nickname for John. I feel like I hear a ton of these variations.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Great example!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahhh yes! Jack is a great example!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am so late to this great conversation! I think what stuck out to me is that I actually do know a lot of babies with some of these top names. Even though statistically it’s not likely, these top names DO feel popular to me. I must live in an area that gravitates towards the Top 20! Liam in particular jumped out… it’s one of the few names my Dh and I agree on, but I know several already, and so we nixed it. I am amazed at how high it ranks. I also know a William or two, and a bunch of Noahs, Olivias, Sophias, and Avas. Charlotte is a family name I almost received (as is Margaret.. my dad pushed hard for a Charlotte and Margaret twin pair… two sister cousins ended up with this pair instead… I guess our family was ahead of that curve). I am not sure how I would have felt with a name that surged 30 years later?
One trend I always look for are the names who always maintain a high ranking vs. sudden spikes… Mason and Harper, to me, are going to be at risk for having a date-stamp on them in decades to come, I think, whereas a name like Benjamin or Abigail will probably just stay sounding classic. I guess we’ll see! I also always find it so intriguing that girl’s names get so much more movement and how our culture is typically more willing to be creative with female names over males. We fit in that category too… I am willing to risk a little more with the girl names. But both of our kids’ names fell slightly in popularity in 2015 (not surprised at all) with our son’s name going from around 84 the year he was born to 97 and our daughter’s name rose a couple spots to 898 (was 905), but overall, is trending downward from it’s history in the 600’s and 500’s. Um, sorry to spam your blog with 300 comments today? Haha. Can you tell I am sick and stuck surfing online? But I’ve missed following this blog!.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“girl’s names get so much more movement and how our culture is typically more willing to be creative with female names over males” — I know, that always interests me too! I feel like the more “creative” the boy’s name, the more likely it is to be perceived as somewhat feminine and/or to be taken by the girls.
(I’m delighted to see all your comments today!! So sorry you’re sick!!)
LikeLike
[…] regarding the popularity of names today not being the same as the popularity of names in the past: This great comment from our very own grace and Even the Top 10 Is Not Necessarily the Kiss of Death by Swistle. Also […]
LikeLike
[…] 360 is really not that popular at all, especially given what we know about name popularity today (here, here). All in all, I think it’s sort of in a sweet spot of popularity — uncommon yet […]
LikeLike
[…] per year as Michael was during its longtime reign as no. 1. You can read more about that phenomenon here and here, it’s pretty interesting, and should soothe their worries about popularity a little […]
LikeLike
The biggest “name pocket” name I saw in my area was based on the variations thing as you said with Kate. Kate and all varieties of Caitlin/Kaitlin/Katelyn was a popular name in the late 80s. Then there’s the whole New England Irish-Catholic population thing to add in a healthy dose of Kathleens and Katherines…. plus some variations like Kathryn, Cathryn, Catherine etc. and any variation of Kate was BY FAR the most popular name I saw in college…. within a student leader group of about 15-16 students we had two Kathryns (one went by Katy), a Caitlyn and a Kaitlin.
When I traveled to WYD in Poland our diocesan group of 70 had about 5 Mikes and at least 2 Joes, but no other repeat names.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So interesting!
LikeLike
[…] 2015 data […]
LikeLike